UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS

No. 22325.

401 F.2d 901 (1968)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold WILLIAMS, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

October 21, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Berg (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

John G. Milano, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Harold Williams was tried before a jury and found guilty of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1964). On this appeal from the judgment of conviction, he first contends that the trial court erred in not giving his proposed jury instruction on the defense of insanity, or an instruction on that subject based on section 4.01 of the American Law Institute Model Penal Code.

The instruction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases