1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 437 P.2d
  5. 437 P.2d 851 (1968)
 

STATE v. HENRY

437 P.2d 851 (1968)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Albert HENRY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided February 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy Dist. Atty., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, Dist. Atty., Portland.

Before PERRY, C.J., and SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN and LUSK, JJ.

HOLMAN, Justice.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of illegal possession of narcotics and has appealed.

Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motion for an acquittal made at the completion of the state's case. The motion was based upon a claim that there was insufficient evidence that defendant had personal possession of narcotics found in the home of defendant and his wife when it was searched by police officers pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases