JARVIK v. MAGIC MOUNTAIN CORPORATION

No. 68 Civ. 395.

290 F.Supp. 998 (1968)

Laurence JARVIK, an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Murray Jarvik and Murray Jarvik, Plaintiffs, v. MAGIC MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 25, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

First & First, New York City, for plaintiffs; Lee B. First, New York City, of counsel.

Thomas J. Walsh, Garden City, N. Y., for defendant; Thomas Grimes, New York City, of counsel.


OPINION

McLEAN, District Judge.

This motion by defendant to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction again raises the question considered by Judge Croake in Podolsky v. Devinney, 281 F.Supp. 488 (S.D.N.Y.1968) of the constitutionality of the New York attachment rule announced in Seider v. Roth, 17 N.Y.2d 111, 269 N.Y.S.2d 99, 216 N.E.2d 312 (1966) and reaffirmed in Simpson v. Loehmann...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases