UNITED STATES of America
v.
AMERICAN OIL COMPANY et al., Defendants.
United States District Court D. New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 15, 1968.
October 15, 1968.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., by Donald Horowitz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Bernard Wehrmann, James Daniels, David Leinsdorf, New York City, Dept. of Justice, for the Government.
Stickel & Stickel, by Robert W. McCann, Newark, N. J., for American Oil Co., Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, by Hammond E. Chaffetz, Chicago, Ill., Paul Uhlenhop, Chicago, Ill., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, by Ronald S. Daniels, New York City, of counsel.
McCarter & English, Newark, N. J., for Atlantic Richfield Co., Hughes, Hubbard, Blair & Reed, by Jerome G. Shapiro, New York City, Harvey D. Myerson, New York City, of counsel.
Stryker, Tams & Dill, by William L. Dill, Jr., Newark, N. J., for Humble Oil and Refining Co., Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, by A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City, Henry F. Hartmann, New York City, of counsel.
Carey & Jardine, by Robert Carey Jr., Newark, N. J., for Gulf Oil Corp., Kissam & Halpin, by Leo T. Kissam, New York City, of counsel.
Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, by Donald B. Kipp, Newark, N. J., for Sinclair Refining Co., Wickes, Riddell, Bloomer, Jacobi & McGuire, by Harold F. McGuire, New York City, of counsel.
Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, by Dickinson R. Debevoise, Newark, N. J., for Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc., Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, by Edward N. Sherry, New York City, of counsel.
Milton, Keane & De Bona, by Thomas J. Brady, Jersey City, N. J., for Cities Service Oil Co. and for Cities Service Co., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, by Jay H. Topkis, New York City, George H. Colin, New York City, of counsel.
United States District Court D. New Jersey.
On Motions For Severance
WORTENDYKE, District Judge:
Although the Indictment in this Sherman Act case was filed early in 1965 numerous pretrial motions by certain of the named defendants have required the Court to embody its decisions thereon in several Opinions. They are reported respectively at 249 F.Supp. 130 (December 30, 1965), 253 F.Supp. 783
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
