PIQUA v. HINGER

No. 68-110.

15 Ohio St. 2d 110 (1968)

CITY OF PIQUA, APPELLANT, v. HINGER, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 3, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. R. K. Wilson, director of law, for appellant.

Messrs. Faust, Harrelson & Thornburgh and Mr. William H. Thornburgh, for appellee.


HERBERT, J.

The question raised in this case is whether the ruling in Miranda is applicable in misdemeanor cases.

We have examined the record in this case and find that Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, is applicable and dispositive of the issue of admissibility of the questioned evidence.

At the outset, it should be noted that no material objection was made to the questions that defendant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases