MUNIZ v. ROSALES

No. B-704.

428 S.W.2d 809 (1968)

Leopoldo MUNIZ, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. Victor ROSALES, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 15, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. J. Vale, Pope & Pope, John A. Pope, III, Rio Grande City, for petitioners.

F. R. Nye, Jr., Glenn H. Ramey, Rio Grande City, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioners urge that the judgment rendered in Francisco Escobar Garcia v. Servando Orta, et al, No. 2373 on the docket of the District Court of Starr County, was a decree of partition and hence all parties to said partition are necessary parties to the present suit. See Garza v. Kenedy, 299 S.W. 231 (Tex. Com. of Appeals, holding approved by the Supreme Court, 1927).

The judgment in that case discloses that the court treated the 6016 acres of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases