1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 387 F.2d
  5. 387 F.2d 849 (1968)
 

UNITED STATES v. STANACK SALES CO.

Nos. 16507-16509.

387 F.2d 849 (1968)

UNITED STATES of America v. STANACK SALES CO., Inc., Samuel Ackerman, Howard Ackerman, Stanley Ackerman. Stanack Sales Co., Inc., Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. STANACK SALES CO., Inc., Samuel Ackerman, Howard Ackerman, Stanley Ackerman. Howard Ackerman, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. STANACK SALES Co., Inc., Samuel Ackerman, Howard Ackerman, Stanley Ackerman. Stanley Ackerman, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided January 5, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Slauson, Englewood, N. J., for appellants.

Edwin H. Stier, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Walter E. Byerley, Atty., Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, Stanack Sales Co., Inc. (Stanack), Howard Ackerman, secretary-treasurer of Stanack and Stanley Ackerman, the brother of Howard and a salesman for Stanack, were each charged1 and convicted by a jury on two counts2 of violating 21 U.S.C. § 331(f) which makes it unlawful to refuse to permit a drug-factory inspection as authorized by 21 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases