1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 16 Ohio
  5. 16 Ohio St. 2d 106 (1968)
 

IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES v. FORTE

No. 68-68.

16 Ohio St. 2d 106 (1968)

IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES: MASHETER, DIR. OF HIGHWAYS, APPELLEE, v. FORTE ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 24, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Luchett, Hoffman & O'Brien and Mr. James A. O'Brien, for appellants.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. Harry N. Kandel, for appellee.

O'NEILL, J.

The first assignment of error by the appellants is that the Common Pleas Court did not have jurisdiction in the case because the Director of Highways did not comply with the procedure to be followed in appropriating property for highway purposes, which is set forth in Sections 5519.01 and 5519.02, Revised Code. The appellants contend that the notice served upon them did not "contain, or have attached, a definite, accurate, and detailed description of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases