1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 395 F.2d
  5. 395 F.2d 812 (1968)
 

APPLICATION OF SIEGEL

Patent Appeal No. 7908.

395 F.2d 812 (1968)

Application of Edgar SIEGEL and Klaus Sasse.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied October 10, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Connolly & Hutz, John A. Sarjeant, Wilmington, Del. (Werner H. Hutz, Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C. (Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and Judges RICH, SMITH, ALMOND, and KIRKPATRICK.

SMITH, Judge.

Two issues are before this court in this appeal: (1) whether the appealed claims are so "unduly broad and indefinite" as to constitute a failure to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph; and (2) whether the appealed claims are obvious in view of the prior art of record within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Those issues arise in an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases