1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 264 Cal.App.2d
  5. 264 Cal.App.2d 915 (1968)
 

ENGELMAN v. BOOKASTA

Docket No. 31527.

264 Cal.App.2d 915 (1968)

71 Cal. Rptr. 120

HOWARD ENGELMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. E.H. BOOKASTA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 14, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gold, Herscher & Taback, and Daniel M. Herscher for Defendant and Appellant.

Harold Rubins for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

SHINN, J.*

The appeal is from an order denying a motion of defendant Bookasta for discharge of an attachment. The ground of the motion was that the attachment had been irregularly and improperly issued. [1] Appellant has advanced no sound reason for questioning the order denying his motion. We believe the court ruled correctly and that we must affirm the order.

In the hearing on the motion appellant contended, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases