1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 280 F.Supp.
  5. 280 F.Supp. 896 (1968)
 

SORTEX CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. UNITED STATES

C. D. 3329; Protest No. 64/13198-20082-63.

280 F.Supp. 896 (1968)

SORTEX CO. OF NORTH AMERICA, Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

February 29, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Joshua M. Davidson and Allan H. Kamnitz, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., (Sheila Ziff and Thomas Fernandes, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO, FORD and WATSON, Judges.

WATSON, Judge.

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of five Sortex electronic color separating or sorting machines, type G 414, hereinafter referred to as "Sortex machines", which were classified under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation to give effect to certain trade concessions, T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55649, at the rate of 12½ per centum ad valorem, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases