1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 395 F.2d
  5. 395 F.2d 771 (1968)
 

CROTEAU v. BORDEN COMPANY

No. 17104.

395 F.2d 771 (1968)

Jack R. CROTEAU, Appellant, v. BORDEN COMPANY and Eastman Kodak Corporation.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided June 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Love, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Victor L. Drexel, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dolores B. Sesso, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant Eastman Kodak Company entered upon a verdict directed by the district court after the close of the defendant's case.1 The district court held, inter alia, that Eastman Kodak's failure to warn was not the proximate cause of an explosion which resulted in plaintiff's loss of his left hand. See Croteau...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases