ROSE v. McMAHON

Docket No. 3,457.

10 Mich. App. 104 (1968)

158 N.W.2d 791

ROSE v. McMAHON

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 22, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes & Davis, for plaintiffs.

Hillman, Baxter & Hammond, for defendant.


Decided March 22, 1968. See 381 Mich. 756.

LESINSKI, C.J.

The plaintiffs, Raymond Rose and Leona Rose, appeal a directed verdict granted in favor of the defendant by the trial judge who concluded, after all the proofs were completed, that the plaintiffs had not presented evidence entitling them to go to the jury.

When the plaintiff, Raymond Rose, having entered the defendant's establishment, the Lena...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases