1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 283 F.Supp.
  5. 283 F.Supp. 850 (1968)
 

PLASTIC CONTACT LENS CO. v. GUARANTEED CONTACT LENSES, INC.

No. 63 Civ. 388.

283 F.Supp. 850 (1968)

The PLASTIC CONTACT LENS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GUARANTEED CONTACT LENSES, INC., Dr. Leonard Seidner, doing business as Quality Optical Company of New York, Dr. Leonard Seidner and Joseph Seidner, Individually and doing business as Quality Optical Company of New York, John Doe, Richard Roe, Doe Corporation, Inc., and Roe Corporation, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 20, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karpatkin, Ohrenstein & Karpatkin, Marvin M. Karpatkin, New York City, for plaintiff.

Jack Smolen, Flushing, N. Y., for defendants.

CANNELLA, District Judge.

Action to recover royalties under a patent licensing contract. Verdict for the plaintiff. Defendants' counterclaim is dismissed.

JURISDICTION

The court finds:

That the requisite jurisdictional monetary requirement is satisfactory and that the court has jurisdiction under Section 1332 of Title 28 of the United States Code.

The court finds:

That the plaintiff, The Plastic Contact Lens Co., hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases