ZEITLIN v. MERRICK BAY PARK


56 Misc.2d 1039 (1968)

Arnold Zeitlin et al., Respondents, v. Merrick Bay Park, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

June 5, 1968


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Silverman & Lipschitz (Ira P. Block of counsel), for appellant. Arnold Zeitlin, respondent in person.

Concur — HOGAN, P. J., GLICKMAN and PITTONI, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Under the circumstances shown here, we find no abuse of the trial court's discretion in refusing defendant's request for an adjournment. Aside from the fact that defendant had adequate time, prior to the trial date, to implead the proposed third-party defendant, it is admitted that no notification was given to plaintiffs that an adjournment of the trial would be requested. On these facts, to compel plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases