WELLMAN v. LAMPROS


430 Pa. 654 (1968)

Wellman, Appellant, v. Lampros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 1, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan Routman, with him Routman, Moore & Goldstone, for appellant.

Philip E. Brockway, with him Brockway, Brockway and Kuhn, for appellees.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, July 1, 1968:

Judgment affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS:

Of the issues involved in this litigation, I believe the court below correctly resolved all but one. Appellant, the lessee of a drive-in movie owned by appellees, contends that appellees failed at the termination of the lease to permit him to remove car heaters valued at $3,750 which appellant claims are his property. Appellees, on the other hand, cite two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases