BAINUM v. PATTON

No. A-220405.

17 Ohio Misc. 91 (1968)

BAINUM, APPELLEE, v. PATTON, APPELLANT.

Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County.

Decided December 9, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James Halloran and Messrs. Cors, Hair & Hartsock, for appellee.

Mr. Daniel H. McKinney and Messrs. Porter & McKinney, for appellant.


BETTMAN, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the Cincinnati Municipal Court. The facts set out in the amended narrative bill of exceptions in brief are as follows. Plaintiff brought suit on a promissory note. At the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the note was conditional on its face and there was no proof that the condition had been satisfied. The court said that in its opinion the note was conditional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases