1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 159 N.W.2d
  5. 159 N.W.2d 907 (1968)
 

AMATO v. HARADEN

No. 40633.

159 N.W.2d 907 (1968)

Fred AMATO, Respondent, v. Helen Elizabeth HARADEN et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 14, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MacDonald & Munger, Duluth, for appellants.

Wangansteen & Bangs, Chisholm, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and MURPHY, ROGOSHESKE, SHERAN and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial in an action to determine a boundary by practical location. The action was brought by Fred Amato against his neighbors, Helen Elizabeth and Mary Jane Haraden, to determine the boundary line between lots owned and occupied by them. The court found for plaintiff, and defendants assert error contending that the evidence was not sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases