1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 265 Cal.App.2d
  5. 265 Cal.App.2d 793 (1968)
 

DUNTLEY v. CITY OF CAMARILLO

Docket No. 31630.

265 Cal.App.2d 793 (1968)

71 Cal. Rptr. 736

ROBERT M. DUNTLEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF CAMARILLO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 18, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, William H. Hair and E. John Stanley for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney and Burke, Williams & Sorensen for Defendants and Respondents.

FILES, P.J.

This proceeding in mandamus was brought by plaintiffs to compel defendants to terminate certain proceedings which were then pending for the annexation of uninhabited territory. After a hearing in which the only contested issue involved the effect of the 1963 amendment to subdivision (b) of section 35313 of the Government Code (Stats. 1963, ch. 1082, § 1, p. 2544), judgment was entered for defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases