BURNS v. UNITED STATES

No. 21890.

390 F.2d 659 (1968)

Daniel Anthony BURNS, also known as Daniel Anthony Jasek, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 26, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Lindberg, Tucson, Ariz. (argued), for appellant.

Jo Ann D. Diamos (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Edward E. Davis, U.S. Atty. Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Convicted of interstate transportation of a stolen car under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appellant challenges the sufficiency of proof that the car found in his possession in Arizona was the same as the one stolen in Illinois. His attack is on testimony given by a Government witness and the basis of his attack is that the witness was not sufficiently qualified as an expert.

The testimony in question was not opinion testimony but was factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases