1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 392 F.2d
  5. 392 F.2d 653 (1968)
 

APPLICATION OF HARRINGTON

Patent Appeal Nos. 8138, 8160.

392 F.2d 653 (1968)

Application of John V. HARRINGTON and Henning H. Borchers. Application of Detlef WINKELMANN.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 25, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Bryan, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C. (Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented for determination in each of these appeals, consolidated here solely for purposes of the present decision, is whether a motion to strike the brief for the solicitor, filed by the party appellant in each case, should be granted.

In Patent Appeal 8138, appellants moved to strike the brief for the solicitor on the ground that the "[b]rief is replete with misstatements of fact and law." Appellants' main challenge to the solicitor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases