STIFFLER v. CITY OF TRAVERSE CITY

Docket No. 2,982.

11 Mich. App. 93 (1968)

160 N.W.2d 610

STIFFLER v. CITY OF TRAVERSE CITY.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 3, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Coulter & Forster, for plaintiff.

Roger Watson, City Attorney (Charles H. Menmuir and Joseph J. Zimmerman, of counsel), for defendant City.


BURNS, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a dismissal of their cause of action which, among other things not relevant to this appeal, sought a judgment declaring the city of Traverse City's ordinance amendment 102 invalid.

The center of the controversy is a light and power plant which has been owned and operated by the city of Traverse City since 1928. The plant is situated on the waterfront at the south end of the west Grand Traverse bay and supplies the electrical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases