1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 263 Cal.App.2d
  5. 263 Cal.App.2d 771 (1968)
 

ULMER v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 31679.

263 Cal.App.2d 771 (1968)

69 Cal. Rptr. 754

VIOLET ULMER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 9, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernst Lipschutz for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and John A. Daly, Assistant City Attorneys, and Nowland C. Hong, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

A summary judgment, entered upon defendant's motion, was brought to us by plaintiff's appeal. [1] We find the support required for this "drastic" method of obtaining a judgment quite lacking, and we are reversing the judgment.

It appears that plaintiff and some companions were visiting Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, on the evening of June 24, 1965, when, about 10 o'clock, they were advised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases