1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 21 N.Y.2d
  5. 21 N.Y.2d 1006 (1968)
 

NOBLE v. SINGAPORE RESORT MOTEL OF MIAMI BEACH

21 N.Y.2d 1006 (1968)

Madeline Noble et al., Respondents, v. Singapore Resort Motel of Miami Beach, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 18, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irwin Strum, Bernard Helfenstein and Harvey Kupferberg for appellant.

Harry Fass for respondents.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN concur.

Per Curiam.

Since the cause of action asserted against the defendant corporation did not arise from the transaction of any business in New York within the sense of CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 1), the only question presented is whether the defendant's activity in the State constituted the doing of business in the traditional sense under CPLR 301. However, determination of that question (compare Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases