MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
It would be a useless gesture to put in writing the history of this petitioner as set forth in the record. To say that there is substantial evidence to sustain the charges is the most direct answer to this appeal. It is further alleged that the petitioner's rights were violated by a refusal to grant an adjournment, but the record is replete with such adjournments. On April 19, 1967 there was an adjournment
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.