Motion to amend remittitur denied. Since cross appeals are here involved, neither party is entitled to costs. With respect to interest, there is no need for any amendment since, as we read the Appellate Division opinion, the proceeds of the letter of credit, to which defendant-respondent-appellant is entitled, include interest (as sought by said party) upon the escrow deposit of $400,000. [See
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SOMMER v. GEN. BRONZE CORP.
21 N.Y.2d 989 (1968)
Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, v. General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents. Hays, Algase, Feuer, Porter & Spanier, Respondent, v. Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, and General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted April 1, 1968.
Decided April 11, 1968.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.