MIEHL v. DARPINO


99 N.J. Super. 1 (1968)

238 A.2d 203

THEODORE MIEHL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JERRY DARPINO, DEFENDANT, AND THE CITY OF HAMMONTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 22, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Miller argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Miller, Brone, Valore & McAllister, attorneys).

Mr. James L. Cooper argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Arkus & Cooper, attorneys).

Before Judges KILKENNY, CARTON and FRITZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Defendant City of Hammonton appeals from a judgment entered against it and in favor of plaintiff upon a jury verdict, predicated upon certain municipal activities in connection with snow removal.

On January 13, 1964 a heavy snow fell on Hammonton. The blizzard was of such intensity that the assistant chairman of defendant's highway committee, in the absence of the chairman, authorized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases