Affirmed.
Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale and possession of narcotic drugs (former Penal Law, §§ 1751, 1751-a) on the testimony of a police undercover agent who made a purchase of marijuana from defendant. The overwhelming weight of the evidence, in our opinion, established that defendant did not act solely as an agent of the buyer; that there was no entrapment, even if it be assumed that entrapment was a defense prior to the effective date...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.