The appellant first argues that there is no connection between the accident of September 18, 1963 and the schedule loss of 7½% of the claimant's left arm. Dr. Gifford testified that, considering the facts of the accident, the defects which he found equivalent to a loss of 7½% of the use of the left arm were caused by the accident. His testimony as to his reason for such a finding was sufficiently detailed to show a medical basis...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
