FITZGERALD v. HOPKINS

No. 38535.

70 Wn.2d 924 (1967)

425 P.2d 920

JAMES H. FITZGERALD et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT HOPKINS et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 30, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miracle, Treadwell & Pruzan, for appellants.

Paul W. Robben and Arthur G. Barnett, for respondents.


WEAVER, J.

At the trial level this case presented a scintillating and intriguing dissertation on the art of sculpturing. It loses much of its glitter on appeal, however, for it presents, basically, a fact question.

Plaintiff, James H. Fitzgerald, 54 years of age, alleges in his complaint and amended complaint that "he has established himself over a period of years, as one of the foremost sculptors in the Northwest." The trial court found, and the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases