1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 153 S.E.2d
  5. 153 S.E.2d 819 (1967)
 

TYNDALL v. TYNDALL

No. 358.

153 S.E.2d 819 (1967)

270 N.C. 106

Lloyd M. TYNDALL, Plaintiff, v. Muriel T. TYNDALL, Defendant, and Goldsboro Savings and Loan Association, Garnishee.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 12, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Futrelle, Goldsboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Herbert B. Hulse, Goldsboro, for defendant appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff knew his children would not "go hungry" if the two hundred dollars per month he paid in compliance with the consent judgment were used for their support. Moreover, he knew his children would "go lacking" in some respects if he did not make additional payments for their support. Whatever the status of defendant's personal financial affairs the gravamen of the complaint is that defendant failed to use money paid to her for the support of the children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases