APPLICATION OF SCHNELL

Patent Appeal No. 7702.

370 F.2d 596 (1967)

In the Matter of the Application of Hermann SCHNELL, Hans Joachim Rehberg and Wilhelm Hechelhammer.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 12, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Connolly & Hutz, Wilmington, Del. (Earl Christensen, Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C. (Jere W. Sears, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.


RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, affirming the rejection of claims 11-19 of application serial No. 660,767, filed May 22, 1957, entitled "Dental Prostheses and Dental Aids." No claim has been allowed.

The invention is a dental prosthetic device, for example, a denture, in which polycarbonate resin is employed in the manufacture of the "gum" portion. Claim 11 is typical:

11. A dental prosthesis device...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases