Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No questions of fact have been considered.
In our opinion, under the peculiar facts of this case, it was prejudicial error for the trial court to refuse to allow cross-examination with reference to all of defendant's statements to the police. From the proof presented by the People, it appeared that, when apprehended, defendant was not only interrogated by police officers with respect to the facts involved in the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
