1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 379 F.2d
  5. 379 F.2d 586 (1967)
 

CLAUSS v. FOULKE

Patent Appeal No. 7683.

379 F.2d 586 (1967)

Richard J. CLAUSS and Henry Brown, Appellants, v. Donald Gardner FOULKE, Otto Kardos and Herman Koretzky, Appellees.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Neal A. Waldrop, Detroit, Mich. (Sidney Wallenstein, Chicago, Ill., and Albert C. Martin, Grosse Ile, Mich., of counsel), for appellants.

Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City (James W. Laist, Robert J. Kadel, New York City, Carl G. Seutter, New York City, Charles N. Shane, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellees.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, RICH, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges, and WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

Clauss and Brown1 appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Foulke, Kardos and Koretzky,2 of a process for producing bright nickel deposits from an electroplating bath, as reflected in the only count:

1. The process for producing bright nickel deposits which comprises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases