As a result of the taking, 9.13 acres were left with access to the highway, some of which fronted thereon, and some 58.3 acres were completely landlocked. The court found that the highest and best use prior to the taking was for homesites along the highway frontage and for farming purposes for the balance. With reference to the farming land he further found that it had a potential for subdivision when other, more suitable, land in the area...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
