1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 263 F.Supp.
  5. 263 F.Supp. 699 (1967)
 

ARD v. STATE STOVE MANUFACTURERS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 66-655.

263 F.Supp. 699 (1967)

Julian D. ARD and Angela B. Ard, Plaintiffs, v. STATE STOVE MANUFACTURERS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

February 2, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore, Mouzon & McGee, Charleston, S. C., for plaintiff.

Grimball & Cabaniss, Charleston, S. C., for defendant.

ORDER

SIMONS, District Judge.

Defendant State Stove & Manufacturing Company, Inc., [named in the complaint as State Stove Manufacturers, Inc.] appears specially to move to quash the service of process upon it, and to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction upon ground that service of process upon it is insufficient. Plaintiffs also move to strike the second defense set up in the answer1 on grounds that the said defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases