VENUTO v. STRAUSS

No. 4118.

415 S.W.2d 543 (1967)

Albert VENUTO, Appellant, v. Richard A. STRAUSS, Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

March 3, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryant, Glenn & Thomas, Jack Bryant, Abilene, for appellant.

Whitten, Harrell & Jameson, Josephine M. Jameson, Abilene, for appellee.


WALTER, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Richard A. Strauss recovered a judgment against Albert Venuto. Venuto has appealed.

Strauss' cause of action was based on a promissory note executed by Venuto. Venuto admitted executing the note but contended there was no consideration for its execution. He further contended in his verified answer that at the time the note was executed it was agreed that the note would be paid out of Strauss' profits from his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases