1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 148 N.W.2d
  5. 148 N.W.2d 804 (1967)
 

McMENOMY v. RYDEN

No. 39924.

148 N.W.2d 804 (1967)

Edward B. McMENOMY et al., Respondents, v. Arnold J. RYDEN, Jr., et al., Defendants, Arnold J. Ryden, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorsey, Owen, Marquart, Windhorst & West, Henry Halladay and Curtis D. Forslund, Minneapolis, for appellants.

McMenomy, Hertogs & Fluegel, Hastings, Fred Burstein, Minneapolis, for respondents.

OPINION

KNUTSON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment wherein the questions involved were certified by the trial court as being important and doubtful.

Midwest Technical Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Midwest) was incorporated under Minnesota law in 1958 as a closed-end, nondiversified investment company. The purpose of its existence is to invest funds of its stockholders in securities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases