COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE v. RAFFERTY

Docket No. 759.

252 Cal.App.2d 694 (1967)

60 Cal. Rptr. 765

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAX RAFFERTY, as Superintendent of Public Instruction, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

July 20, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Richard L. Mayers, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

George A. Huberty, County Counsel, and Ernest Geddes, District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


STONE, J.

This appeal is from a judgment granting a writ of mandate ordering Max Rafferty, Superintendent of Public Instruction, to certify to Alan Cranston, State Controller, that $24,833.88 is due respondent, County of Tuolumne, under section 20211 of the Education Code, and commanding Cranston to draw his warrant on the general fund of the State of California in that amount payable to the County Treasurer of Tuolumne...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases