WHOOLERY v. HAGAN

[No. 575, September Term, 1966.]

247 Md. 699 (1967)

234 A.2d 605

WHOOLERY v. HAGAN, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 7, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on the brief by Sidney Blum and Kenneth R. Hammer for appellant.

Jeffrey B. Smith, with whom were Barbara Ann Spicer and Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.


McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant (Whoolery) wants a new trial. He says the trial judge's charge to the jury contains error sufficient to justify upsetting the judgment against him for costs. We do not see it that way.

The City of Baltimore has for some years engaged The Welsbach Corporation (Welsbach) to maintain the street lamps in the parks and on the bridges. At about 8:30 p.m. on 24 August 1961 the drawbridge operator ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases