In our opinion, the testimony of the informer exonerating defendant meets the requirements of subdivision 7 of section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the motion for a new trial should have been granted. We also think that, although defendant's requested charge on identification was seriously deficient, it should have elicited some cautionary instruction to the jury as to the circumstances under which the identifications were made (cf. United States v. Wade<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.