Apart from defendant's alleged admissions to obviously biased witnesses, I believe the proof in this arson case was inadequate to show that a crime had been committed i.e., that the fire had been intentionally set. The main other proof came from a supposed eyewitness and a Fire Marshal. The eyewitness did not disclose his presence at the scene...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.