1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 266 F.Supp.
  5. 266 F.Supp. 668 (1967)
 

GROSS PLUMBING & RUBBER CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 2971; Protest No. 62/4311-90230.

266 F.Supp. 668 (1967)

GROSS PLUMBING & RUBBER CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

April 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tompkins & Tompkins, New York City (Allerton deC. Tompkins, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Harvey A. Isaacs and Alfred A. Taylor, Jr., New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO and FORD, Judges.

RAO, Chief Judge:

A shipment of aerators with stainless steel clamp straps, imported through the port of Philadelphia, was classified for customs duty purposes as articles not specially provided for, partly or wholly manufactured, composed in chief value of brass, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas.Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and subjected to duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases