TUCKER v. CENTENNIAL INS. CO.

Docket No. 8188.

247 Cal.App.2d 685 (1967)

56 Cal. Rptr. 17

PRENTISS N. TUCKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rutan & Tucker, Robert C. Todd and Richard A. Curnutt for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Moss, Lyon & Dunn, Charles B. Smith and Henry F. Walker for Defendant and Respondent.


BROWN (Gerald), P.J.

Plaintiff, Prentiss N. Tucker, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend on the ground it failed to state a cause of action.

[1] The complaint was in declaratory relief; plaintiff insured sought to determine defendant Centennial Insurance Company's duty to defend an action brought before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases