AUTRY v. CRUMPLER

No. 11054.

377 F.2d 547 (1967)

Tonya Kay AUTRY and Animal Haven, Inc., Appellants, v. Paul M. CRUMPLER et al., Appellees

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided May 2, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tonya Kay Autry, in pro per., on brief for appellants.

James R. Nance, Nance, Barrington, Collier & Singleton, Fayetteville, N. C., Harry M. Lee, Angier, N. C., Hubert Humphrey and McLendon, Brim, Brooks, Pierce & Daniels, Greensboro, N. C., on briefs for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Dismissal of the complaint for want of jurisdiction is affirmed.

There is no diversity of citizenship. The defendants are citizens of North Carolina. The corporate plaintiff is organized under the laws of that state and has its only place of business there. The individual plaintiff resides in North Carolina, and the record abundantly supports the finding that she is a citizen of that state, not of Florida.

The action, involving the treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases