In arriving at the damages sustained in the taking of certain of claimant's buildings, it appears that the court relied upon reproduction cost less depreciation. There was no basis in law and fact for the application of this theory of damages. These improvements were not shown to be unique or a specialty and the evaluation by this method was, therefore, in error (Guthmuller v. State of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KINGSBURY v. STATE
27 A.D.2d 893 (1967)
Andrew E. Kingsbury, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant. (Claim No. 40930.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 15, 1967
March 15, 1967
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
