1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 27 A.D.2d
  5. 27 A.D.2d 869 (1967)
 

DE LAURENTIS v. BERCOWITZ

27 A.D.2d 869 (1967)

Rudolph De Laurentis et al., Appellants, v. Allen R. Bercowitz et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 6, 1967

REYNOLDS, J.

Upon the showing made in this case, appellants' motion for discontinuance should not have been denied in the absence of special circumstances more compelling than those here present (Schultz v. Kobus, 15 A.D.2d 382; see Piedmont Hotel Co. v. Nettleton Co., 241 App. Div. 562, 563-564; cf. Conklin v. Wilbur, 26 A.D.2d 666), and the motion should

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases