1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 201 So.2d
  5. 201 So.2d 672 (1967)
 

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY v. FRUGÉ

No. 2139.

201 So.2d 672 (1967)

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Relator, v. Eula Mae FRUGÉ et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Writ Granted June 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shotwell & Brown, by Burt W. Sperry, Monroe, Edwards, Edwards & Broadhurst, by William C. Broadhurst, Crowley, for plaintiff-relator.

Pugh, Buatt, Landry & Pugh, Aaron & Aaron, by J. Donald Aaron, Jr., Reggie & Harrington, by T. Barrett Harrington, Crowley, for defendants-respondents.

EN BANC.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on the plaintiff's application for supervisory relief.

The plaintiff, a natural gas company, filed some ten expropriation suits in connection with the construction of a pipe line planned to be placed in service by September 1, 1967. The trial court denied the plaintiff's motion to fix these cases for trial during July and August of 1967.

The plaintiff applies to this court for supervisory relief, urging the necessity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases