Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff, and the matter is remanded for assessment of damages.
On the prior appeal of this matter this court, in effect, held that it was the defendant that breached the contract and not the plaintiff, stating in part as follows: "it appears that, prior to the time the defendants were claiming a breach by the plaintiff of the advertising clause
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.