UBER v. OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO.

Docket No. 7993.

247 Cal.App.2d 611 (1967)

55 Cal. Rptr. 720

MICHAEL GENE UBER, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants; NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 5, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parker, Stanbury, McGee, Peckham & Garrett, Raymond G. Stanbury, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps and Robert G. Steiner for Defendants and Appellants.

Smith, Prante & Biggins and Robert C. Baxley for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.


COUGHLIN, J.

Plaintiff sustained injuries in an automobile accident; in a previous action recovered judgment against the driver of an automobile involved in the accident; and by the instant action sought recovery on that judgment from the defendant insurance companies under policies of liability insurance respectively issued by them to three automobile sales agencies plaintiff claims were the owners of the automobile at the time of the accident. Each policy contained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases